
Contact: Ryan Lippe
(614) 466-7269
COLUMBUS, Ohio – April 17, 2009 – In two actions today, the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC) will ask the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) to reconsider a decision that is imposing a decade of rate increases on residential customers of American Electric Power’s (AEP) Ohio utilities, and ask the Supreme Court of Ohio to block AEP from collecting the retroactive portion of the rate increase currently being charged to customers.
The PUCO modified and approved AEP’s electric security plan on March 18. Based on annual caps established by the PUCO, in 2011 Columbus Southern Power customers could pay 20 percent more and Ohio Power customers could pay 25 percent more than rates prior to the electric security plan. In addition, the PUCO allowed AEP to defer, for recovery from customers beginning in 2012, the amount of costs that would cause rates to exceed those caps, estimated to be $900 million.
“Residential consumers cannot afford to give any more of their incomes to utilities than what is justified, fair and lawful,” said Consumers’ Counsel Janine Migden-Ostrander. “The PUCO should take a second look at its decision in light of our many arguments that major portions of the rate increase violate state law and regulatory rules.”
The following are among the many concerns addressed by the OCC in its request for the PUCO to reconsider its decision:
Increased vegetation management charges –AEP was granted $104.5 million for increased tree trimming and other vegetation management. The OCC believes the PUCO should first determine how much of the funds already collected from customers AEP has been spending on these programs before requiring customers to pay more money. AEP has provided no detail on past expenditures and what factors led to the deterioration of its distribution system.
In a related matter, the OCC – joined by Kroger, the Ohio Hospital Association and the Ohio Manufacturers’ Association – will ask today that the Supreme Court of Ohio act immediately to block AEP from collecting the retroactive portion of the rate increase currently being collected from customers. The OCC estimates that if the retroactive rates are not stopped, it will cost Columbus Southern Power customers approximately $30 million, while Ohio Power customers will pay $33 million. Earlier, the OCC had asked the PUCO to act to prohibit the retroactive rates. That request was denied by the PUCO on March 30.
The OCC’s action at the Court requests that immediate and extraordinary action from the Court in the form of a “writ of prohibition” be issued to stop the retroactive portion from being collected from customers. The writ would remain in place and prevent further collection until a final legal decision can be made regarding the lawfulness of retroactive ratemaking.
“The PUCO made an unlawful decision when it imposed a full year of rate increases to be paid by AEP customers in nine months,” Migden-Ostrander said. “Because the PUCO rejected our request to stay the decision, the rate increases have gone into effect and we are requesting the Supreme Court take immediate steps so consumers may be shielded from the continued and unlawful collection of retroactive rates. The retroactive increase is like charging a student an increase in tuition payments three months after the student has graduated. No one should stand for that.”
End of Page